Sample Report Of New Businss

Is Chile a country dedicated leader?

Opinion article:

recognized is the "skill" or ability of the Chilean market to "adopt" new technologies. Applause for the high per capita rate of cellular (more phones than people "?), Introduction of Facebook and social networking groups (to levels even higher than most developed countries and general recreational use), high Internet penetration (Why Chat and role playing? and teleworking, and education?).

in "adopting" I do not see any value in itself. The interesting thing is to "adapt", where some brains be applied and some engineering to use, well-known case of countries like China or Japan in its infancy, which went to "adopt" to "adapt" and from there broke the pattern with its own technology path to leadership through a different path, leading to a breakdown in its development model.

development, in my opinion, is like the horizon, the more you walk, the further away. Everything is a frame of reference problem, but that does not mean that no progress or move more welfare for citizens, it is only in relative terms our "benchmark" of development, to be variable in essence, creates a distance that increases to be mere adopters and adapters and no fewer developers of self-knowledge.

Countries eastern horizon and changed the way they became horizon for others.

All this rhetoric is just to say that my impression is that Chile has the vocation of "adoption" of a mass chiche trained to buy everything we sell, what is wrong with us if any local engineering weight for aggregating value to technology that is mostly used to just play and not be more productive. missing spark, the explosion that separates the adoption of adaptation and generation value that would allow an improvement in the terms of trade and greater wealth for Chile. However, I doubt it if this country really wants to leadership positions and is willing to accept the risk posed by a country split between "net adopter" to "net developer" high value added.

Can you be a leader without going through a stage of break? In my opinion no, and personally I see an extreme conformity and "conservatism" (I am not referring to the ethical sense) in general, with very few those who dare to be themselves and comfortable in front of an empty road. They feel more secure if they see someone else before them, in fact adopting a posture of the flock, which is the most distant of a leader I can think of.

What is to be leader (in my humble opinion)

• The leader creates and transforms.
• invests leader and "losses" are only cost a learner ..
• The leaders develop its market, not only its own niche.
• The leader is not the safe bet.
• leader is no reference to the other, has its dreams ahead.
• The leader does not see failure as something negative, he learns of it and capitalized.
• The leader does not see success as something permanent, but as the result of a hundred "failures."
• The leader is never quiet, never satisfied.
• leader will be made day to day small decisions

begin today "?